<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?><?xml-stylesheet href="tnlrss200.css" type="text/css" media="screen" ?><rss version="2.0"> <channel><title>Life of Dave</title><link>http://www.davidbarber.org/blogger.html</link><description>David Barber's Weblog</description><lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 22:24:08 GMT</lastBuildDate><generator>DavidBarber.org custom software</generator>
             <!-- next line starts new blog entry -->
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 22:24:08 GMT</pubDate>
<title>shouldn't we raise all boats?</title>
<link>http://www.davidbarber.org/blogger.html#MonMay1422_24_082012</link>
<description>
<![CDATA[<p>The nice thing about economics is the way it gives you simplified models. Some would say the not-nice thing is that most of the models are crap, but whatever. So I started this evening to look at the cost of education. And as is often the case when you start to try to pull things apart, they get complicated, quickly. And even if you get a model you like, when you try to plug numbers in, things get crazy. Take, for example, this <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124040633530943487.html">article in the Wall Street Journal</a>, which asserts that the US is performing sixteen percent below where it would be, in terms of GDP, if the kids here were educated as well as in Korea. But I suspect they would not then draw the logical conclusion - if we increase spending on education, and catch our kids up to Korea, anything we spend less that sixteen percent of GDP is pure profit. So we could spend 16 percent of 14.59 trillion dollars (i.e. 2.3 trillion dollars) on education, and if our kids catch up to Korea, we would break even. Note that I think the numbers from this report are bull crap, but you get the idea. So if more education makes us all richer, and in the process makes us all smarter too, why does everyone want to cut spending on it?</p>]]>
</description>
<comments>http://www.davidbarber.org/cgi-bin/createcommentform.pl?MonMay1422_24_082012</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 4 May 2012 09:33:12 GMT</pubDate>
<title>Arkansas state code</title>
<link>http://www.davidbarber.org/blogger.html#FriMay409_33_112012</link>
<description>
<![CDATA[<p>You know what really makes me angry? When things that have no business being under lock and key are put there. When I went looking for the state's tax laws, I was presented with the following message: <blockquote>Arkansas Code – Free Public Access Provided by the Bureau of Legislative Research The Arkansas Code of 1987 is copyrighted by the State of Arkansas. By using this website, the user acknowledges the State's copyright interests in the Arkansas Code of 1987. Neither the Arkansas Code of 1987 nor any portions thereof shall be reproduced without the written permission of the Arkansas Code Revision Commission, except for fair use under the copyright laws of the United States of America, and except that Arkansas Code of 1987 section text, numbering, and lettering may be copied from this website by the user.</blockquote> Even worse, this is some of the weirdest text I've ever seen - is it non-reproducible, or isn't it. Either way, messages like this one have a chilling effect, and offend me in a very profound manner.</p>]]>
</description>
<comments>http://www.davidbarber.org/cgi-bin/createcommentform.pl?FriMay409_33_112012</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 18:18:32 GMT</pubDate>
<title>MRI</title>
<link>http://www.davidbarber.org/blogger.html#TueApr1018_18_322012</link>
<description>
<![CDATA[<p>About six months ago my shoulder started acting oddly. I took some pills, they didn't help, so today I went for an MRI to see what's going on in there. It was, in a word, freaky. At the beginning they handed me some cushy headphones and a 'oh god make it stop' switch, 'just in case'. Then they rolled me in. I hadn't known why they gave me headphones, but once the machine turned on it became very clear - MRIs are LOUD! And rhythmic. It kind of reminded me of European club music I used to listen to - so much so I've been racking my brain trying to remember the song that it reminded me of. I suspect there's some seriously cool music waiting to be pulled out from the MRI cacophony. I didn't use the 'oh god stop' switch, but it was a close run thing - those machines are creeeeeeepy. I definitely had to talk myself in to sticking it out. Thank goodness it was a quick one - I can't imagine staying in there for much longer!</p>]]>
</description>
<comments>http://www.davidbarber.org/cgi-bin/createcommentform.pl?TueApr1018_18_322012</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 09:30:07 GMT</pubDate>
<title>laptop adventures</title>
<link>http://www.davidbarber.org/blogger.html#ThuMar2909_30_072012</link>
<description>
<![CDATA[<p>A week or so ago, my laptop died. Some playing around determined the video card, a <a href="http://www.nvidia.com/object/quadro_nvs_notebook_techspecs.html">Quadro NVS 140M</a>, was mostly dead. Since the laptop was 5 years old, I decided to strip it for parts, sell the rest, and get a swanky new laptop. Which was when I discovered that at some point computer manufacturers had decided that the place to cut costs was in the screen. Since my laptop is my primary photo editing and organizing platform, and since I had <a href="https://plus.google.com/106621183962583814472/posts">wedding pictures</a> I wanted to get up, this change made me particularly unhappy. Then a wonderful thing happened: a sale! So now I have a new laptop in the mail to me, with a quad core i7, 8GB of RAM, and a swanky video card as well, not to mention a 1080p screen. We'll see how it goes - I'm not going to name the brand just yet - we'll see if the computer actually works out before naming any names.</p>]]>
</description>
<comments>http://www.davidbarber.org/cgi-bin/createcommentform.pl?ThuMar2909_30_072012</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 00:00:52 GMT</pubDate>
<title>American Airlines customer service</title>
<link>http://www.davidbarber.org/blogger.html#FriMar1600_00_522012</link>
<description>
<![CDATA[<p>Last August, a computer error between Orbitz and Continental (now American) Airlines resulted in my wife being stranded in London, not sure if she was going to make it home. Obviously, as soon as she did manage to make it home, we re-contacted both parties (it goes without saying we had contacted them frantically from London the day of the event, which taught us that you should never book with a company that doesn't have a phone number local to the country you are going to - being put on hold when you're paying a dollar a minute makes you extra mad). After cross-finger pointing, American/Continental seemed to accept responsibility, and offered us a puny voucher. This took several months, and at one point I waited several weeks, before receiving a message from the helpdesk person (excuse me - Senior Executive Specialist) saying my message had been delayed in the now merging Continental and American email systems.</p><p>All of this is background to the phone call I received yesterday, which was this woman, once again saying my message had been delayed. I just checked, and the message was sent in November. I was actually so confused I just laughed. So there's customer service for you. In theory, we'll be receiving a voucher. I wonder if they'll beat the one year anniversary?</p>]]>
</description>
<comments>http://www.davidbarber.org/cgi-bin/createcommentform.pl?FriMar1600_00_522012</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:47:38 GMT</pubDate>
<title>40 hour work week</title>
<link>http://www.davidbarber.org/blogger.html#MonFeb2722_47_382012</link>
<description>
<![CDATA[<p>Start with the basics: what do we all, more or less, agree on? A job should allow a person to live. If someone works 40 hours per week, or whatever a 'full time job' requires, they should be able to afford to feed themselves, clothe themselves, and have a place to live. I <i>think</i> we even agree that at some point that person should be able to retire.</p><p>Is that a basic tenet of modern life? If so, where does part time work fit in? If someone works two jobs at twenty hours a week, do they deserve the same thing as someone who works 'full time'? I would assert yes. Which means two things: one, we can't treat part time work differently than full time work - any amount of work at any number of jobs should, if added up to 40, give the same benefit. But - and here's a catch - if we do that, we need to move a lot of things off the employer. Things we might not expect - like sick time and holiday pay (if we think those are things people should have). Health care (no question there - especially as it gets more expensive, we can't expect employers to foot the bill). Obviously retirement. We can let employers add to the basics to attract workers, but whatever we consider the minimum should not be left to employers if there is any way for them to opt out. Otherwise, as a rational business, they must opt out.</p>]]>
</description>
<comments>http://www.davidbarber.org/cgi-bin/createcommentform.pl?MonFeb2722_47_382012</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:13:05 GMT</pubDate>
<title>Austerity</title>
<link>http://www.davidbarber.org/blogger.html#MonFeb1300_13_052012</link>
<description>
<![CDATA[<p>So... more on the Greek / European debt fiasco. I tried to avoid it - I now know how <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/kairyssdal">Kai Ryssdal</a> feels when he says he won't talk about it until the real-real-real deadline sometime in March. But it's the gift that keeps on taking a crap under your Christmas tree (I probably need a better metaphor there). Now reports are that a <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/13/us-greece-idUSTRE8120HI20120213">harsh austerity bill has passed, and there are riots everywhere</a>. And there should be. These kind of crisis-driven cuts are exactly the kind of crap the IMF likes to pull. A "22 percent reduction in the minimum wage" is not the way to win friends and influence people, and it's not the way to get the Greek consumer spending again. One Greek noted <a href="https://plus.google.com/u/0/102063317248595630152/posts/D4tGbojJkFn">on Google Plus</a> that "[t]hese austerity measures that are being forced to Greece right now will only suffocate it's people", adding "[n]ew austerity measures are being applied every 3 months, because the measures before them didn't deliver the desired results...And how could they, when all the measures are about taxes, taxes, taxes...". And there's a real question about who exactly we should blame for all this anyway - as one <a href="http://roarmag.org/2011/06/greek-debt-crisis-international-media/">article</a> notes, it wasn't Greek banks playing all fast and loose with kooky investment schemes. "Punishing Greece is like a perverse confirmation of the EU’s inherent powerlessness, and a confirmation of the fact that the EU is mainly a bureaucratic institution that fails to act politically when it has to in order to stave off catastrophe."</p><p>The above article also shows another side to this whole mess: European countries are getting angry at each other. The stereotypes that used to be just jokes on the street are starting to be taken a little too seriously. It's not hard to imagine things going off the rails in many of these places - Sarkozy and Merkel both have tough fights coming up soon, and the right wing in Europe is always hanging around, waiting to be taken seriously again.</p><p>On the same day, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/12/portugal-protest-austerity_n_1270438.html">Portugal also had major protests</a>, for the same reasons: "Spending cuts and tax hikes needed to meet the fiscal terms of the bailout have caused the worst recession in Portugal since the few turbulent years that followed the 1974 return to democracy. Unemployment is at a record of around 13 percent."</p><p>The funny thing is that I have to believe that everyone believes austerity works, else why would Britain do it to themselves (and <a href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/11/cameron-and-the-confidence-fairy-an-update/">how's that working out, then?</a>) The old 'insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different outcome' would seem to apply in spades to this, and yet, here we are again.</p>]]>
</description>
<comments>http://www.davidbarber.org/cgi-bin/createcommentform.pl?MonFeb1300_13_052012</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:38:27 GMT</pubDate>
<title>Random thoughts on workflow</title>
<link>http://www.davidbarber.org/blogger.html#ThuJan1910_38_272012</link>
<description>
<![CDATA[<p>I use Google Plus. I admit it. I kind of like it better than facebook. I know - that's weird. But I do. I like the circles - I like being able to use it like twitter and facebook combined.</p><p>Since I do use it a bit like twitter, I tend to make my posts public. Not all of them, but many of them. And since I am nearly the only person who uses Plus, I figured I might as well push my public posts to twitter and facebook as well. Why not? And this is where things started to go off the rails.</p><p>First off, there's the question of how do I even get things across the platforms? Thanks to the fact that a lot of money rests on which social network 'wins', it's not that easy. I finally found a tool (<a href="http://gplus.sagg.im/">Rob McGee</a>) that pushes things across. But, of course, if I'm pushing things to twitter, I need some sort of link shortener. And since I also like to know whether anyone is reading what I write, I used one that lets me track clickthroughs - <a href="http://bit.ly">bit.ly</a>.</p><p>So now let's review - say I'm reading an article on how <a href="http://on.io9.com/wuXD3m">other animals are much better dancers than penguins</a>, and I want to share it. My current workflow is: (1) copy the story URL and (2) paste it into the bit.ly box. (3) Copy the shortened URL and (4) post it into the Google Plus status update box. (5) Write something pithy that is less than 140 characters. (6) Add Rob McGee to the post so it will be sent to twitter and facebook, and, finally, (7) hit the post button.</p><p>On my phone (and I'm sure I could find a plug-in for my browser), I can hit the menu on my browser and say 'share this to facebook'. Someday I hope - I really hope - I can do the same with all my social networks at once. But I've a sneaky suspicion it's going to get worse before it gets better.</p>]]>
</description>
<comments>http://www.davidbarber.org/cgi-bin/createcommentform.pl?ThuJan1910_38_272012</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:59:28 GMT</pubDate>
<title>the Regina Spektor school of music</title>
<link>http://www.davidbarber.org/blogger.html#WedJan1818_59_282012</link>
<description>
<![CDATA[<p>Fads or phases in music are funny things. I heard a new (to me) artist on the radio, Rachel Platten (the song was <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r61LFkzKzQQ">1,000 Ships</a>), and she reminded me of Regina Spektor (of <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wigqKfLWjvM">Fidelity</a> fame, among others). Which made me wonder if in fact there was a 'Regina Spektor school of music' that had been kicked off. Further research reminded me that Regina Spektor was, <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=106762140">at least in some circles</a>, seen as a progeny of Tori Amos - which seemed a bit of a stretch to me. But I do remember Amos seeming to kick off her own cycle of female musicians (and being seen as a descendent of Kate Bush, which also seemed a stretch to me at the time).</p><p>But it's also worth noting that right now the female vocalist is fairly popular - something to do with Glee and Adele, I think. It's all crazy complicated, but the idea that all of these pop phenomena feed each other and lead to each other is fun, if complicated to work through.</p>]]>
</description>
<comments>http://www.davidbarber.org/cgi-bin/createcommentform.pl?WedJan1818_59_282012</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 22:44:40 GMT</pubDate>
<title>North Korean transition</title>
<link>http://www.davidbarber.org/blogger.html#TueDec2022_44_402011</link>
<description>
<![CDATA[<p>Whups! Someone linked here, and my last post was an incoherent mess relating to the ongoing development I'm doing on the software running the blog. Guess I should write something sensible. Probably about Kim Jong Il, since that's the big news this week that everyone should probably be talking about. But frankly, it's kind of pointless, since noone knows anything, and I'd just be repeating what other people who don't know anything have already said. To demonstrate, I'll point you to this short <a href="http://www.iie.com/publications/interviews/interview.cfm?ResearchID=2009">interview with Marcus Noland</a>, an expert on North Korea, who says 'we don't know anything'. And then proceeds to speculate.</p>]]>
</description>
<comments>http://www.davidbarber.org/cgi-bin/createcommentform.pl?TueDec2022_44_402011</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 23:16:16 GMT</pubDate>
<title>More developments</title>
<link>http://www.davidbarber.org/blogger.html#MonDec1923_16_162011</link>
<description>
<![CDATA[<p>Still not there, but it's getting a lot better. I feel ok about the fact that the styling isn't where I want it to be - if I can't see everything right now, at least I can see it becoming what I want it to be. I think I'm done with the programming on this side for right now - just the styling now. At least for this particular function - I still need to update it so comments display on the same page as the permalink, instead of having two copies of every story someone comments on. Ideally, I'll figure out how to use facebook's silly stuff to do comments, and allow those to be posted but without having to use the FB comments for everything. We'll see how that all goes at a much later date.</p>]]>
</description>
<comments>http://www.davidbarber.org/cgi-bin/createcommentform.pl?MonDec1923_16_162011</comments>
</item>

</channel> </rss>
