<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?><?xml-stylesheet href="tnlrss200.css" type="text/css" media="screen" ?><rss version="2.0"> <channel><title>Life of Dave</title><link>http://www.davidbarber.org/blogger.html</link><description>David Barber's Weblog</description><lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:38:27 GMT</lastBuildDate><generator>DavidBarber.org custom software</generator>
             <!-- next line starts new blog entry -->
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:38:27 GMT</pubDate>
<title>Random thoughts on workflow</title>
<link>http://www.davidbarber.org/blogger.html#ThuJan1910_38_272012</link>
<description>
<![CDATA[<p>I use Google Plus. I admit it. I kind of like it better than facebook. I know - that's weird. But I do. I like the circles - I like being able to use it like twitter and facebook combined.</p><p>Since I do use it a bit like twitter, I tend to make my posts public. Not all of them, but many of them. And since I am nearly the only person who uses Plus, I figured I might as well push my public posts to twitter and facebook as well. Why not? And this is where things started to go off the rails.</p><p>First off, there's the question of how do I even get things across the platforms? Thanks to the fact that a lot of money rests on which social network 'wins', it's not that easy. I finally found a tool (<a href="http://gplus.sagg.im/">Rob McGee</a>) that pushes things across. But, of course, if I'm pushing things to twitter, I need some sort of link shortener. And since I also like to know whether anyone is reading what I write, I used one that lets me track clickthroughs - <a href="http://bit.ly">bit.ly</a>.</p><p>So now let's review - say I'm reading an article on how <a href="http://on.io9.com/wuXD3m">other animals are much better dancers than penguins</a>, and I want to share it. My current workflow is: (1) copy the story URL and (2) paste it into the bit.ly box. (3) Copy the shortened URL and (4) post it into the Google Plus status update box. (5) Write something pithy that is less than 140 characters. (6) Add Rob McGee to the post so it will be sent to twitter and facebook, and, finally, (7) hit the post button.</p><p>On my phone (and I'm sure I could find a plug-in for my browser), I can hit the menu on my browser and say 'share this to facebook'. Someday I hope - I really hope - I can do the same with all my social networks at once. But I've a sneaky suspicion it's going to get worse before it gets better.</p>]]>
</description>
<comments>http://www.davidbarber.org/cgi-bin/createcommentform.pl?ThuJan1910_38_272012</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:59:28 GMT</pubDate>
<title>the Regina Spektor school of music</title>
<link>http://www.davidbarber.org/blogger.html#WedJan1818_59_282012</link>
<description>
<![CDATA[<p>Fads or phases in music are funny things. I heard a new (to me) artist on the radio, Rachel Platten (the song was <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r61LFkzKzQQ">1,000 Ships</a>), and she reminded me of Regina Spektor (of <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wigqKfLWjvM">Fidelity</a> fame, among others). Which made me wonder if in fact there was a 'Regina Spektor school of music' that had been kicked off. Further research reminded me that Regina Spektor was, <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=106762140">at least in some circles</a>, seen as a progeny of Tori Amos - which seemed a bit of a stretch to me. But I do remember Amos seeming to kick off her own cycle of female musicians (and being seen as a descendent of Kate Bush, which also seemed a stretch to me at the time).</p><p>But it's also worth noting that right now the female vocalist is fairly popular - something to do with Glee and Adele, I think. It's all crazy complicated, but the idea that all of these pop phenomena feed each other and lead to each other is fun, if complicated to work through.</p>]]>
</description>
<comments>http://www.davidbarber.org/cgi-bin/createcommentform.pl?WedJan1818_59_282012</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 22:44:40 GMT</pubDate>
<title>North Korean transition</title>
<link>http://www.davidbarber.org/blogger.html#TueDec2022_44_402011</link>
<description>
<![CDATA[<p>Whups! Someone linked here, and my last post was an incoherent mess relating to the ongoing development I'm doing on the software running the blog. Guess I should write something sensible. Probably about Kim Jong Il, since that's the big news this week that everyone should probably be talking about. But frankly, it's kind of pointless, since noone knows anything, and I'd just be repeating what other people who don't know anything have already said. To demonstrate, I'll point you to this short <a href="http://www.iie.com/publications/interviews/interview.cfm?ResearchID=2009">interview with Marcus Noland</a>, an expert on North Korea, who says 'we don't know anything'. And then proceeds to speculate.</p>]]>
</description>
<comments>http://www.davidbarber.org/cgi-bin/createcommentform.pl?TueDec2022_44_402011</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 23:16:16 GMT</pubDate>
<title>More developments</title>
<link>http://www.davidbarber.org/blogger.html#MonDec1923_16_162011</link>
<description>
<![CDATA[<p>Still not there, but it's getting a lot better. I feel ok about the fact that the styling isn't where I want it to be - if I can't see everything right now, at least I can see it becoming what I want it to be. I think I'm done with the programming on this side for right now - just the styling now. At least for this particular function - I still need to update it so comments display on the same page as the permalink, instead of having two copies of every story someone comments on. Ideally, I'll figure out how to use facebook's silly stuff to do comments, and allow those to be posted but without having to use the FB comments for everything. We'll see how that all goes at a much later date.</p>]]>
</description>
<comments>http://www.davidbarber.org/cgi-bin/createcommentform.pl?MonDec1923_16_162011</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 00:13:22 GMT</pubDate>
<title>working on my blog software</title>
<link>http://www.davidbarber.org/blogger.html#MonDec1900_13_222011</link>
<description>
<![CDATA[<p>In the spirit of the weekend, I did some crazy programming on my blog. It's not done yet, but I've done it in such a way that I don't need to finish it all at once. Which is good, because although I had it working hours ago, styling it and making the facebook plugin work on it is killing me. So I'll leave it where it is, and we'll see if this posts, or blows up terribly!</p>]]>
</description>
<comments>http://www.davidbarber.org/cgi-bin/createcommentform.pl?MonDec1900_13_222011</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 17:05:57 GMT</pubDate>
<title>Android development, day 1</title>
<link>http://www.davidbarber.org/blogger.html#SatDec1717_05_562011</link>
<description>
<![CDATA[<p>I've been thinking for a while that it would be nice to be able to post to my blog as easily as I post to social media sites. Blog posts would not be fun from my phone (I can already do that, anyway), but being able to post a photo from my phone would be nice. So I decided I would write an app. And this is where things went off the rails. This post will get technical from here, but I'll try to keep it readable by non-tech folk.</p><p>The first thing I needed to do was to figure out... well, what I needed to do. So I hit a few websites, basically looking for directions on how to write my first app (by tradition, this a program that simply prints "Hello, world!" on the screen). I found several pages that all told me the basic steps (<a href="http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/write-google-android-application/">this one</a> is an example). Sadly, although the information in the post was good, Google's support of developers does not seem to be - their servers spent most of a day rejecting requests for the files. So eight hours later I'm no closer to being able to write a program than I was when I started. I'm considering giving up for the day and doing something more fun than watching paint dry.</p>]]>
</description>
<comments>http://www.davidbarber.org/cgi-bin/createcommentform.pl?SatDec1717_05_562011</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Dec 2011 09:23:15 GMT</pubDate>
<title>Europe, again</title>
<link>http://www.davidbarber.org/blogger.html#FriDec909_23_152011</link>
<description>
<![CDATA[<p>It would be tremendously funny if it weren't... not funny: I just noticed my post from November 1st commenting on the European debt crisis. One month later... same old, same old. It's amazing how these things go. On some level, I wonder if it's not the old 'how to boil a frog' business - rates creep upward, and nobody pays attention until, hey presto! you're boiled!</p>]]>
</description>
<comments>http://www.davidbarber.org/cgi-bin/createcommentform.pl?FriDec909_23_152011</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Nov 2011 11:15:30 GMT</pubDate>
<title>two turntables and a pair of ears</title>
<link>http://www.davidbarber.org/blogger.html#WedNov911_15_302011</link>
<description>
<![CDATA[<p>Possibly as a reaction to the whole Greek/Italian debt fiasco, I decided to do something completely different: I wrote a small article answering the question <a href="/technology/vinyl.html">Is an "audiophile" turntable really better?</a></p>]]>
</description>
<comments>http://www.davidbarber.org/cgi-bin/createcommentform.pl?WedNov911_15_302011</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 1 Nov 2011 22:48:41 GMT</pubDate>
<title>Greek debt</title>
<link>http://www.davidbarber.org/blogger.html#TueNov122_48_412011</link>
<description>
<![CDATA[<p>I swear if someone were actually writing the script, this whole Greek debt fiasco could not look more like a keystone cops caper. Germany wants a deal, no they don't, yes they do. Greece wants a deal, no they don't, yes they do. And the whole time, like a zany flagpole sitter losing his balance, the stock market is up, then down, then up, then down.</p>]]>
</description>
<comments>http://www.davidbarber.org/cgi-bin/createcommentform.pl?TueNov122_48_412011</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 14:37:19 GMT</pubDate>
<title>Vaccines</title>
<link>http://www.davidbarber.org/blogger.html#ThuOct2714_37_182011</link>
<description>
<![CDATA[<p>Vaccines are important. If you do not maintain full vaccination, you get outbreaks. Like below... </p><p> <iframe src="http://www.cfr.org/interactives/GH_Vaccine_Map/index.html?width=700" width="700" height="630" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0">Loading...</iframe></p></p>]]>
</description>
<comments>http://www.davidbarber.org/cgi-bin/createcommentform.pl?ThuOct2714_37_182011</comments>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 22:07:04 GMT</pubDate>
<title>civil discourse</title>
<link>http://www.davidbarber.org/blogger.html#WedOct1922_07_042011</link>
<description>
<![CDATA[<p>One of the things I've been reminded of since the economic crisis started is the way that the ... I'm actually having trouble deciding on what to call them - progressives? - have been reacting to the right by adjusting their rhetoric to one of two levels - understated or shrill. The fact is that since the whole 'war on terror' mess began, everything spoken at a normal volume - concerns, for example, about the AAA status of certain investments - was ignored. So people got hyperbolic about it, and then they were dismissed as crazies. So they tone it down, and then get ignored because their concerns are isolated, or just not that important / concerning. So you end up being damned either way. I raise this because of the <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2011/oct/19/naomi-wolf-arrest-occupy-wall-street">recent arrest of Naomi Wolf</a>. Now I will confess I have a soft spot in my heart for Ms. Wolf - everything I learned about, well, a lot, I learned from her books in my late high school / early college years. But as I've grown older I've also come to recognize that she can be a bit 'over the top', as it were. And the article linked above is no different - it tells the story of her arrest, and closes with a paraphrase of a quote that gets used a bit too often, in too many situations: "first they come for the 'other' – the 'terrorist', the brown person, the Muslim, the outsider; then they come for you". In a <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/oct/19/naomi-wolf-occupy-wall-street-arrested">related article</a> she calls the permit system put in place to prevent groups from gathering as "Stalinist". But again, how do you say, politely, 'many of our civil rights are being eroded, and noone is doing anything about it' - and once you've said it, and been dismissed, how do you keep saying it politely?</p>]]>
</description>
<comments>http://www.davidbarber.org/cgi-bin/createcommentform.pl?WedOct1922_07_042011</comments>
</item>

</channel> </rss>
